Just a few weeks ago I was writing about this as the future. Just a little refining and it becomes awesome. Think about shop fittings, newspapers delivered wirelessly, clothing....
Discuss.
Thursday, September 11, 2008
The future is coming...
Monday, September 08, 2008
Let me tell you about this T-shirt
Since finishing the new book I’ve been thinking about how a smaller organisation can get its act together.
A great marketing strategy isn’t just about getting all the elements of the marketing mix ‘right’. As marketers never tire of telling you – it’s more complicated, deeper than that.
But complication means problems.
For a small organisation, like an SME or a charity, execution of a marketing plan is where it all happens. Because of the limited resources to hand, the basic tasks of a marketing plan can seem overwhelming and, importantly, take valuable people away from running other vital operations.
There is, in fact, a related problem for larger companies. How do they communicate what must be done – internally and to others such as agencies – in order to allocate sufficient resources?
One reason this struck me forcibly as I finished the book, and then discussed this with Nick, was that the ‘new marketing’ demanded by the web and other converging technologies gives us even less room for manoeuvre.
Even more than ever, marketing is something you have to do now and every day. And it all has to work together, day after day.
Great small organisations know and do this. Larger organisations often struggle.
So as I wrote about online promotion and the maintenance of an online brand, I emphasised ‘consistency’ and ‘integration’.
Consistency. When everything you say and do refers to your core values.
Integration. When everything you do links to everything else you do.
Since then, Nick and I have been discussing a marketing strategy ‘mantra’ that could remind us of what the rules are. I’ll go into all this at greater length in the next few posts but for now I’ll just leave you to consider…
Insight, purpose, truth & beauty.
Religion, Lies and Videotape
Thanks to my brother for sending this. Have a look; it's interesting from two perspectives.
One is that the Republicans (and media) are clearly using the same formulae to try and unsettle potential Democrat voters (remember a small proportion of the electorate decide the outcome by shifting from one party to another).
It's also interesting that this video is edited in such a way that it's difficult to note anything other than that fact - the same phrases crop up - sometimes the context is obscure...who is saying what about whom.
One thing is clear, some (ignorant) people see it as their job, or their right, to spread disinformation for their own ends. Take the assertion that 'Hussein' or attending a Muslim school makes Barack Obama a Muslim... that's basically distorting the truth.
Or lying.
Saturday, August 16, 2008
Another useful tool
It looks like an wasy way of picking up content from anywhere on the web and keeping is. But more importantly you can clip it and immediately post it on a blog. This is great, not just for public blogs like ours, but also for collaborative working using a private blog.
Anyway, I'll see how this turns out - I've just clipped some images and words from the clipmarks website - you should get some links as well...
|
Tuesday, July 15, 2008
You have received a new message...
...possibly from the Big Guy upstairs
I was due to change my PC yesterday - had it all organised. But then the old one died - it wouldn't boot up and the Windows CD couldn't resolve the problem without a lot of knowledge from me - or from the thousands of pages of online help (via the other, home, computer).
So I played around with my new phone to get emails...it worked up to a point. I could set up some email accounts (I have about six) but not all...because I can't remember all the settings and passwords.
I managed to send the following to this blog, which some of you might have seen...
"Not so amazing, but when the hard drive on your PC goes kaput (the day before you're due to take delivery of a new one) you realise the value of a back-up. Now, when did I last back-up, and where did I put it. By the way I have nearly 100 passwords... what are the chances I'll recover them all?"
...but it came along with several paragraphs of cr*p from Vodafone and my mobile number in big bold letters... not great for a blog entry.
Anyway, the point is. I did have my passwords stored in passwordsafe which is free (and therefore mentioned in the new book!) and I'd backed up the data to a small Newman drive (specifically a NM-0703 20gb drive) along with a copy of dmailer which enabled me to use another PC almost as if it were my own. I carry these around with me pretty much all the time.
Credit where credit's due...I haven't lost everything.
I only mention all this to remind you (and me) to back-up your data every couple of days or so AND to recommend that you have a few other devices to help.
I should get my new PC up and running tomorrow and then I'm probably going to go out and buy a terabyte of disk storage for my home network...
Thursday, June 19, 2008
Ethics...while stocks last.
I know that they work and, sometimes, they add real value to a brand - I've even taught students about the power of 'SP'.
However, I've also felt that the rules should be very clear and that companies should be held to account for sales promotions that mislead. There are, indeed, rules.
The problem is that many SPs go unnoticed, except by the targeted consumers, so unless there is something outrageously wrong, they don't get questioned, let alone reported to Trading Standards or to the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) for a breach of the Code of Advertising Practice (CAP).
So here's a little (true) story about an SP that seems wrong...and IS wrong. And what a big brand did about it. Forgive the long post.
With the recent release of Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, Woolworths was promoting all Indiana Jones toys and since it is my 9 year-old's birthday (on Monday, if you want to send a card) we were aiming to buy him the Lego/Indiana Jones PSP game shown here.Woolworths had an SP - buy any Indiana Jones product for more than £10 and receive a FREE WATCH. So when my wife had paid quite a lot for the PSP game (not actually released, but available in a couple of days) she expected a watch - an additional present for our son.
The watches were out of stock. The manager thought it unlikely that they would get any more in, but nevertheless endorsed the receipt to show that we were entitled to the watch. The posters were still up in the store.
So what's happening? Well, we decided to find out from Woolworth's Customer Relations people. This is what they said...
Thank you for your e-mail.
I was sorry to learn that you were unable to take advantage of the promotion on Indiana Jones/free watch that was recently running in our stores, due to lack of available stock. All our promotions have a beginning and end date so we can monitor their success and all items on offer are subject to availability as stated on the posters and advertisements. I am sorry that on this occasion you missed out of the promotion due to the stocks running out. Please be assured that we would never intentionally mislead our customers.
Having contacted our suppliers, I am sorry we are unable to obtain the watches now.
Thank you for taking the time and trouble to bring this to my attention. I hope that, despite your disappointment on this occasion, you’ll continue shopping with us in the future.
Regards
Jane Hardman
Customer Contact Centre
Mmmm, strange. No offer of an alternative, no desire to satisfy a customer? How much can a child's watch (sourced in China) cost? We suggested that they had an obligation and that they should offer an alternative. Besides, if they had no stock, surely they should stop the promotion? Their reply....
As stated in my last e-mail, as with all promotions and offers, they are subject to availability and while stocks last. This is clearly stated on all advertisements relating to the promotion. For this reason, we are not obliged to offer an alternative to customers.
This may not be the response you were hoping for, and once again I offer my apologies for any disappointment it may cause, however, I’m unable to advise you further on this occasion.
A couple of days had passed. Yet the posters and shelf edges were still there announcing the FREE WATCH offer. I took a photo (on my phone).Here's what the shelf edges looked like - about 3 to 4 inches high, so I guess that white text down the bottom right is no more than 8-10pt. Can you read it? It says 'Subject to availability'
Is this observing the CAP or the law?
The offer was also still on the website...we emailed again. This time we pointed out the crucial text from the CAP on Sales Promotion
- 30.2 Phrases such as "subject to availability" do not relieve promoters of the obligation to take all reasonable steps to avoid disappointing participants.
- 30.4 If promoters are unable to supply demand for a promotional offer because of an unexpectedly high response or some other unanticipated factor outside their control, they should offer refunds or substitute products in accordance with clause 42.5a.
Further to all previous correspondence, whilst it is unfortunate that you remain dissatisfied, there is nothing further I can assist you with or advise you in this matter.
Oh. So that's it is it? Not only couldn't Woolworths provide the FREE gift with which it was enticing customers, it couldn't even account for why it was flouting the CAP.
So I decided to have a look at their guiding principles, set out in the section of their website labelled 'Corporate Social Responsibility'
- We will be truthful and fair in all aspects of our business.
- We will abide by the law.
- We value our good reputation with customers and business partners.
- We will favour suppliers who implement ethical trading standards and will provide them with the support to develop these policies further.
I'm now thinking of spreading this around the web a little - Facebook and the like - to see what effect the web really has.
One of the principles of my new book is that a small business, online, has to be honest. Does that also apply to big companies?
Friday, June 13, 2008
Nearly there....
Friday, May 09, 2008
I feel I must apologise

Thursday, May 01, 2008
What a find!
Getting found online - via your blog, twitter feed, facebook profile etc is all about being connected.
.Tuesday, April 08, 2008
But what does it mean?
I had a look at this site from the BBC following up their season of programmes on the 'white working classes'.
As always there's a lot to think about. Looking at the issues is thought provoking, but I can't help thinking that the debate is framed in slightly the wrong way. I don't want to get too deep into this (too much else on my plate at the moment...deadlines looming!) but I wonder how many people really have as part of their identity that they are 'white' or, indeed, working (or any other) class. I think our understanding of community is far richer than that. However, as with all market research, if you ask people if they are 'oppressed' or badly served, they'll construct appropriate answers.
Actually thing that most struck me about the site was the 'spectrum' gizmo you can see here.
It's a strange old thing that allows you to explore the responses to some research on attitudes to race and immigration. The physics of the particles moving around is quite nicely done (I also like the brain and visual thesaurus which has a similar fluidity), but...and this is the thing that made me stop and wonder...what does it actually show that couldn't be shown in a less flashy format?
Aesthetically, I was drawn to it, but it just doesn't give me a better understanding of the issues. A pity.
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Not a great insight, I'll admit
I just visted the Ideal Home Show. There didn't seem to be many people there.
Friday, March 07, 2008
Great value - Love!
Monday, February 18, 2008
Viral defined
LOL, LOL, LOL :-| :-/ :-) :-D
I defy any parent not to smile at this clip from metacafe...
Laughing Babies -
...sometimes that's all the web is about - sharing a good feeling.
(BTW, I bet the child on the left of frame is going to be the comedian or writer; the others are a great audience but s/he's just watching.)
I've often said that children are 'learning machines' and I think learning to laugh is one of the greatest lessons but not a great as learning to accept being laughed at, occasionally.
Friday, February 08, 2008
Food glorious food...
...hot sausage and custard! [Shurely shome mishtake. Ed.]
I like food. If I was more confident I'd show you a photo to prove it. I haven't got the guts...well, I have actually.
Anyway, Lee Kennedy's latest post reminded me of the issues around food I often discuss with Nick, my co-author. I was telling Nick about Michael Pollan's book In Defence of Food [it's in our book store] which sets out a few simple rules about eating. Rules like; eat only foods your mother would recognise; never eat things if you don't know what the ingredients are; shop mainly from the outside edges of the supermarket floor. They make some intuitive sense.
My point has always been that some of the ingredients in food are there for the benefit of the manufacturers and retailers and not the consumer. Ingredients that make the product last long enough to be transported hundred (thousands) of miles and to sit on a shelf and in a cupboard enable the supply chain to be standardised. It's, perhaps, an example of McDonaldization.
But two thoughts occurred to me.
One. All foodstuffs are composed of chemicals. As Lee says, just look at what's in coffee. Remember what WC Fields said about fish? I also noted when I visited the Eden Project this summer that coconut shell is used in the manufacture of some pretty weird industrial stuff like brake pads - I think its essentially fireproof.
Two. Food is not just fuel or nutrition. It's more (yes, more) importantly a cultural artefact. Mary Douglas and Claude Levi Strauss both pointed out some time ago that food classification are culturally determined. Foodstuffs aren't simply good to eat, they're good to think.
Whether we call food 'wholefood' or 'additive-free' or 'convenience' says more about our relationship with (and our cultural use of) food than it does about any objective food standards. But I'm sure that a greater understanding of how food is produced and what goes into it would benefit us all. maybe there's something in the government's domestic science for all agenda. As long as it's a genuine understanding of food, not just how to make a shepherd's pie.
Not so much healthy eating as healthy thinking.
Tuesday, February 05, 2008
Recession? Oh goody!
Economics is wierd isn't it?
If we talk about recession and try and guard against it, we precipitate it. If everybody dismissed the idea of recession and spent well then...
Will Hutton, who I respect, often talks about the need for government to intervene in the market economy. His comments often attract vitriol for, it seems, daring to suggest that the market may not always work.
Well, I'm pretty clear that the Market works. But the capital letter is there to denote a particular market which dominates out thinking - it even dominates the thinking of politicians on the left.
I've just been reading Bourdieu on politics (chapter 8 of his book Distinction) and what struck me most of all was the emphasis he puts on being able to talk of politics.
Bourdieu points out, in brief, that many people are excluded from having an opinion, or from expressing anything other than the dominant 'logic' of politics, because of their position. Those who are least equipped (largely through education) who are in a dominated position often feel unable to give a response to even an apparently simple question.
Moreover, political questions use the language of politics expressly to exclude; they are expressed in abtract, technical language in expectation of understanding only by those 'qualified'.
The kinds of questions people feel able to respond to vary, often correlating with their 'distance' from the domestic, personal experience.
Questions of economics, which are essentially political, are often disguised as apolitical (appeals to 'common sense' are a dead giveaway!) but also have significant personal ramifications.
One might want the economy to slow down, but you certainly don't want it to result in your house being worth less than you owe on your mortgage.
That we can entertain this possibility, without being struck by the peculiar logic of this 'market' says much about its pervasiveness. How can a company (a mortgage lender) assume no risk (that is to say, a predictale and predicted, therefore accounted-for risk turned into an overhead) whilst individuals (borrowers) assume complete responsibility for the loss (they cannot spread their risk)? The simple answer is; those are the rules of the game.
Occasionally, however, it is interesting to step outside of the game and consider what is just.
I might suggest that it is unjust that landlords can keep properties empty whilst people cannot afford to rent or buy a home. For that matter, it would seem unjust that people must impoverish themselves to have a basic necessity - a permanent dwelling.
The nature of the Market is that it will always arbitrate between competing sources of profit pursued by those with stocks of economic capital. But is is also in the nature of markets that they do not run smoothly and that generating (big) winners inevitably generates (a lot of small) losers.
Even those who see recession as inevitable must agree that for people to lose their homes as a result can, and perhaps should, be ameliorated. That requires intervention on the side of justice, not just to support the myth of the market. And that demands that we acknowledge the voices of those who are unable to speak because they are not shareholders - they are only bit players in the market game.
Friday, January 25, 2008
How do you describe this kind of video?
If this becomes standard in video...DVD and online...well...I just don't know...
Yours, nonplussed.
Phil
Saturday, January 05, 2008
Post-christmas blues...
...New Year's resolutions?
Well, most people make them around the 31st...towards midnight and into the early hours of the 1st. I also heard that you stand a better chance of keeping your resolutions when you're not under pressure.
I have only made one resolution; to write more [I can hear the groans]. It's not enough to resolve to give something up (although I do need to lose a few pounds, take more exercise and so on) I think you probably have to do something positive. Lee Kennedy's blog made me think even more - look at his latest post via the link on the right.
As I've got a deadline to meet, writing about what small businesses can do with web 2.0 (any stories you want to share - email me) and there are at least two other projects I need to make progress on this year I simply bhave to get on and do it. I also, like millions of others need to keep up to date with my blog and facebook etc etc etc - the brilliant Hugh Macleod seems to have it taped - reading his blog linked here is also a good idea.
Need some suggestions to liven up your new year?
Get involved in something. A charity, a campaign, local planning, a club.
For example, in the US you could support Barack Obama - which involves actually registering to vote and voting. If you're in the UK you could also make sure you can vote here. Who knows we might get a candidate worth voting for - in fact if the 40% who didn't vote got behind a say, the Liberal Democrats, they'd stroll into Downing Street. It wouldn't even matter that you don't support them, it would just shake things up.
Also joining any group is a challenge to your preconceptions and forces you to be more tolerant. For example 'everyone who goes to church is a do-goody, holier-than-thou kind of person' - or 'all those people in the theatre club will be arty, luvvie types'. They won't be.
Spend more time shopping. Seriously. Just spend a few seconds looking at the labels of the food products you buy and make a more informed judgement - look how many of the ingredients are in there for the benefit of the manufacturers (long shelf life, keeps the thing stuck together, or to keep it looking the right colour - don't believe me? Check it out). How many of the ingredients are what you set out to buy?
Work out how much your car costs. Oooh, that's harsh. The thing is you can do this in numerous ways but you have to include the purchase cost and running costs. If you paid $10,000 for it last year and sell it this year for $5,000 then it's cost you about $100 a week (plus the running costs). Then you can work out your carbon emissions and offset them!
Of course, I'm not necessarily doing all these things myself....
Wednesday, December 12, 2007
Christmas Greetings
Friday, December 07, 2007
Joining the technorati
Technorati Profile
I know for many of you this only goes to show how far behind the curve I am. But now I'm getting into this stuff I have to sign up for everything to see how it works...then I can write about how it works.
Thos who are already 'in' will know the above leads to a Technorati profile where I can now start to promote the blog....doesn't it?
Time will tell.












